As COVID-19 vaccines begin to roll out, some have questioned their safety and efficacy. Going further, a post on social media claims that the vaccines can be tied to a suspicious lineup of invested parties.
A Facebook post claims that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a research center in the Chinese city where the coronavirus emerged, can be linked to a number of individuals and pharmaceutical companies involved in researching the COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiracy theorists have claimed, without evidence, that the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 was manufactured there.
The post, which has been shared over 1,100 times, claims that the lab in Wuhan is owned by pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline, which supposedly owns Pfizer, the first drug company to receive emergency authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine. The purported connections further spiral, eventually suggesting the involvement of billionaires George Soros and Bill Gates.
The post’s creator did not respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment.
The claim starts to fall apart in its first sentence. The post alleges that the “Chinese biological laboratory in Wuhan,” likely the Wuhan Institute of Virology, is owned by GlaxoSmithKline. It then tumbles into a series of claims about ownership and financing based on that original relationship — which doesn’t exist.
The full name of the institute, which studies viral diseases, is Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, according to its website. It’s controlled by China’s State Council, one of the country’s main government bodies.
In a 2019 open letter to the science journal Nature, a CAS representative wrote that the academy has never achieved financial independence from China. Half of its income comes directly from the government, and the rest comes from “competitive funding or technology transfer,” according to the letter.
“CAS is not run independently of government … The establishment and development of CAS have been entirely based on the wisdom and support of the central government,” the letter reads.
Without the original tie linking the Wuhan lab to Glaxo, the claim’s intended revelation is rendered meaningless. Still, there are a number of other misrepresentations in the post worth noting.
Firstly, British pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline doesn’t own Pfizer.
Pfizer was incorporated in New Jersey in 1900, originally dividing its $2 million of authorized capital into 20,000 shares as a privately held company, its website says. But in 1942, the pharmaceutical company offered 240,000 shares of new common stock to the public; now the company has roughly 69% public ownership.
GSK and Pfizer embarked on a joint venture in 2018, aiming to combine their consumer health care units to allow each company to focus on prescription medicines. But that venture doesn’t involve merging or swapping ownership.
The post also brings investment firm BlackRock into the fold, claiming it “manages” both Pfizer and the “Open Foundation Company,” referring to, albeit misnaming, billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Soros often plays the central role in baseless conspiracy theories, most recently surrounding the pandemic and vaccination against COVID-19.
The Vanguard Group, however, is Pfizer’s largest shareholder, and the post claims its ties to both BlackRock and Microsoft, which Bill Gates co-founded in 1975, are nefarious. Like Soros, Gates is also commonly pulled into unfounded conspiracy theories about the pandemic.
But two decades after Gates’ departure from the company as its CEO, his ties to Microsoft are loose. Gates holds just 1.36% of shares in Microsoft, CNBC reported in March, shortly after Gates left the company’s board.
We rate the claim that a series of links exist between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and companies and figures central to development of a COVID-19 vaccine as FALSE because it was not supported by our research. The primary claim, which sets off the series of links, that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is owned by GlaxoSmithKline is false. That renders the following purported connections meaningless, and many of them are false independently, as well.
Wuhan Institute of Virology, retrieved Dec. 30, About WIV
China State Council, Aug. 28, 2014, State Council Organization Chart
Nature, Oct. 22, 2019, The Chinese Academy of Sciences responds: we are with the government and with the people
Pfizer, retrieved Dec. 30, The Journey
Nasdaq, Pfizer Inc. Common Stock Institutional Holdings (archived version)
Wall Street Journal, Dec. 19, 2018, Pfizer, Glaxo to Create Over-the-Counter Drug Giant
Google search, retrieved Dec. 30, “blackrock” site:https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org
Google search, retrieved Dec. 30, “open society foundation” site:https://www.blackrock.com
Nasdaq, Microsoft Corporation Common Stock Institutional Holdings (archived version)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Dec. 31, 2019, Pfizer SC 136/A
CNN Business, retrieved Dec. 30, BlackRock Inc
CNBC, March 13, Bill Gates leaves Microsoft board
Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app, or electronic newspaper replica here.
Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Fact check: Wuhan lab, vaccine research affiliates not linked